Storytelling shapes our consumer behaviors, directing our choices in services and products, revealing the role of stories in establishing brand…
Tekijät | Authors
Cybersecurity Culture as the Foundation of Resilience – from Awareness Towards Sustainable Operational Capability
True cyber resilience is created by an organizational culture in which staff understand their roles, recognize risks, and act correctly even when there is no oversight. Security culture is reflected in how information is handled, how deviations are reported, how suspicious situations are approached, and how mistakes are learned from.
Organizations’ cybersecurity is increasingly built not on individual technical solutions, but on people’s skills, attitudes, and behaviors. However, simply increasing knowledge does not automatically lead to security, as knowledge does not automatically become competence, competence does not always lead to understanding, and understanding alone is not enough to change behavior.
This creates a gap that separates formal information security from true resilience. Resilience refers to an organization’s ability to anticipate disruptions, withstand their effects, adapt to changing conditions, maintain operational capability during exceptional situations and recover from disruptions back to normal operations.
Artificial intelligence, automation and advanced ransomware are expanding the attack surface, especially for SMEs.
In today’s environment, the majority of successful cyberattacks are linked to human error. Phishing, misuse of credentials and exploiting mistakes made out of carelessness or haste remain key attack vectors.
At the same time, cybercrime is evolving rapidly. Artificial intelligence, automation and advanced ransomware are expanding the attack surface, especially for SMEs, which often operate as part of larger supply chains. In this context, security awareness is no longer a support function but an essential part of risk management, preparedness and ensuring business continuity.
Why Does not Security Awareness Develop Automatically?
Many organizations have a wealth of information related to security. There are more guidelines and training opportunities than ever before, yet practical secure behavior does not always develop as desired.
This is because secure behavior is not based solely on knowledge, but also on competence, the possibilities provided by the everyday work environment, and individual motivation. If the work environment does not support secure practices or security is not perceived as a personal responsibility, even the best guidelines can remain disconnected from daily operations.
Security awareness is also not a one-time state, nor does a single training day or campaign build a security culture. It is a continuous process in which attitudes, skills, and practices develop as part of the organization’s everyday life.
People in different roles also need tailored learning paths so that role-specific competence can develop alongside growing requirements. Here, continuous self-development, training, and strategic organizational guidance play a key role.
Combining Understanding of Structures and Behavior
Effective security work requires both clear strategic structures and an understanding of individual behavior. Without structures, security work easily becomes fragmented and without understanding behavior, security measures may remain superficial.
A strategic approach integrates security awareness into the organization as a whole, where objectives, metrics, responsibilities and continuous development make activities systematic and long-term. Focusing on behavior, in turn, helps identify why people act in certain ways and where the real obstacles to secure behavior arise. Challenges may relate to lack of competence, inadequate tools, or the feeling that secure behavior is not meaningful or possible in the midst of busy work.

Education is seen as key to strengthening competitiveness and overall security.
When these two perspectives are combined, the organization can both measure the development of security and target actions where they have real impact. Continuous competence development, training solutions based on small learning modules, and responding quickly to changing needs have also become central themes at the European Union level.
Security Culture at the Core of Resilience
When security is integrated into everyday life and does not appear as a separate obligation, the organization’s ability not only to prevent threats but also to recover from disruptions is strengthened. The core of resilience is the ability to survive, learn, and continue operations even in exceptional situations.
Information security and cybersecurity are thus matters of people and leadership. Technology enables, but people decide. Moving from awareness to resilience requires long-term work in which security is integrated into strategy, daily operations, and organizational identity. The continuity of the digital transition also requires ongoing planning, the development of new measures, and training to support the operational culture.
This development has also been supported by the European Commission-funded EAGLE “Digital Skills Training” project, which has focused on the training needs for new digital skills. The European Union’s digital transition reform programme is designed to support national actors in meeting the challenges related to learning, competence development, and increasing awareness.
Training Activities as Part of Practical Development
In the EAGLE project, Turku University of Applied Sciences implemented a series of four separate training sessions, in which experts from companies representing different sectors were trained. The core content of the training included the SANS Security Awareness Maturity Model, the COM-B model and the CYSSME maturity model designed for SMEs, all of which were used to examine both organizational development and individual behavioral change.
Sustainable resilience arises from the combination of awareness, behavior, and structures, which develops only through long-term and purposeful work.
The trainings were evaluated as very necessary and successful based on feedback from nearly one hundred participants. The results support the need for similar training activities in the future, both in Finland and more broadly at the European Union level.
At the heart of cybersecurity are no longer just technical solutions, but people, competence and organizational culture. Sustainable resilience arises from the combination of awareness, behavior, and structures, which develops only through long-term and purposeful work. Turku University of Applied Sciences is strongly involved in this development. We increase organizational awareness, strengthen competence and support the building of a security culture both in domestic organizations and more broadly in the European context.
Acknowledgements: This article has received funding partly from the European Union’s Digital Europe Programme (DIGITAL) project “EAGLE – Digital Skills Training” under grant agreement No 101100660. Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA). Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.
This article is part of the publications of the Cyber and Hybrid Resilience research group.
References:
CERT New Zealand. (2022). Cyber change: Behavioural insights.
CYSSME Project. (2024). CYSSME – Cybersecurity for SMEs. https://cyssme.eu/
European Commission. (n.d.). Digital transition – What we do.
https://reform-support.ec.europa.eu/what-we-do/digital-transition_en
European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2555 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS2 Directive). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2555/oj
IBM Security. (n.d.). CISOs list human error as their top cybersecurity risk. https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/cisos-list-human-error-top-cybersecurity-risk
KnowBe4. (n.d.). 88 percent of data breaches are caused by human error. https://blog.knowbe4.com/88-percent-of-data-breaches-are-caused-by-human-error
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2017). Addressing the human element in cybersecurity (FISSEA 30th Annual Conference). https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Events/FISSEA-30th-Annual-Conference/documents/FISSEA2017_Witkowski_Benczik_Jarrin_Walker_Materials_Final.pdf
Project EAGLE. (n.d.). Covering the training gap in digital skills for European SMEs manpower.
https://projecteagle.eu/
SANS Institute. (2021). Strategically managing your human risk: Leverage the security awareness maturity model. https://www.sans.org/blog/strategically-managing-your-human-risk-leverage-the-security-awareness-maturity-model
Photos: Adobe Stock